I Am, therefore I Think

Much to think about here....  I was recently told by a poet I respect highly (and a couple others I respect, but less highly) that I think too much.  I wanna be open to what they're saying and have given what they said much thought (perhaps proving their point - ha!) — and I know I may be wrong, but I can't help but be inclined to believe that anyone who thinks I think too much has observed and/or thought about it too little before drawing that conclusion.  Maybe I'll believe something different after I observe and think some more.  But I don't think so.

*

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 
Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this entry.
Comments

  • 3/14/2010 9:58 AM Elena wrote:
    Don't complain about thinking you think too much. I think a lot also but it is better than not thinking at all. Just think about this.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 10:03 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      No complaints!

      Better to risk thinking too much than thinking too little.

      I wrote a poem about this once:

      Going Mobile
      a title as redundant as I sometimes feel

      Often I feel I 
      overthink 
      most everything I do or say - 
      other times I feel I don't 
      think enough 
      or am thoughtless - 
      sometimes I feel I'm doing 
      or not doing
      both simultaneously.
      It's enough to render me immobile
      like the main man in John 
      Barth's The End of the Road.
      That's when by sheer force of will, 
      whether it's a waste 
      of energy 
      and time 
      or not, 
      I make myself remain mobile - 
      at least in
      this three ring 
      gerbil wheel circus - 
      because I feel 
      if I'm not 
      doing something 
      I might as well
      stop.



      Reply to this
  • 3/14/2010 10:06 AM Elena wrote:
    Siento luego soy. I am because I feel, have emotions and sensations, etc. You don't know you are alive if you just think you are. I believe warmth, love, caring etc. proves I'm not dead either in the mind or the body. We are both you know!
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 10:15 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      ewe? no?  Both are we....
      Reply to this
  • 3/14/2010 10:18 AM Anonymous wrote:
    I think the comments about thinking too much are meant to convey that there is something to be said about allowing yourself/ourselves to be spontaneous and free. When you/we over think- spontaneity is lost.. we can tend to become cautious and safe. For a writer that is a death sentence as far as creativity.

    I think you are often afraid to offend so DO play it safe.I see it in your responses to people and interact with others. Though I think your creative and other urges do lie elsewhere... not in the safety zone. I "think" that is what needs to be tapped to be truly creative.
    I "think" you should write with wild abandon... and not "think" about what others "think"...

    Know you know what I think...
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 10:33 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      I do sometimes write with abandon - but usually don't post it on my blog.
      Reply to this
  • 3/14/2010 10:30 AM lady wrote:
    My thinking can get too caustic sometimes, but most of the time it's enriching. I can be very happy if my head is busy.

    As long as the thinking doesn't involve worrying and as long as I still get some work done, I'm permitting myself to do it, to think.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 10:38 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      I'm glad you made the distinction between thinking and worrying.  I do not believe I think too much -- but I can easily believe I worry too much.  And to be fair, I think that the poet(s) I refer to was(were) driving at exactly that.
      Reply to this
      1. 3/14/2010 11:12 AM Elena wrote:
        Worry never solves a single problem and never will. Just admit you are worrying about whatever and clear it out. Say yes I am worrying Realize it doesn't solve anything. So get rid of it. Release it and be happier. Also sadness is a weight on the mind along with stress, confusion, fear, anger and pain. We all have to stop beating ourselves up and let go of these negative thoughts. If there is any problem in your life come to closure since all unhappiness comes from something that is over and so since all changes every day, every minute just
        DON'T WORRY BE HAPPY.
        Reply to this
        1. 3/14/2010 7:08 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:
          While I think I can worry too much, I think it's just as bad to worry too little. "Worry never solves a single problem and never will?"  Maybe....  But worry can lead to solutions.  If no one worries about global warming, will anyone do anything about it before it's too late?  "Don't worry, be happy" makes a great song lyric and can make good sense for one who's worrying needlessly.  But tell it to the wrongly incarcerated man, the starving AIDS orphan in Africa, or Jewish folks hiding in a cellar in Nazi Germany.
          Reply to this
  • 3/14/2010 1:37 PM Tara wrote:
    "Too much contemplation is a curse that makes an old confusion worse." I don't think that you can think too much, but a person can definitely fall into overthinking something. In the extreme this overthinking is an obsession.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 1:40 PM Tara wrote:
      "Too much contemplation is a curse that makes an old confusion worse." is a quote by the author Theodore Roethke (sp)
      Reply to this
      1. 3/14/2010 6:59 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:
        Dostoevsky said "To be too conscious is an illness" -- but his  über- consciousness resulted in Notes from the Underground and The Brothers Karamazov, two of the greatest literary works ever.  That's an illness I'd be happy to live with.  But just as I think it's impossible to think too much (and I mean open minded, analytical, searching-for-truth thinking -- rather than obsessive, in-the-same-rut, trying to defend what-one-already-believes "thinking," which isn't really thinking to me), I also believe it isn't possible to be too conscious.
        Reply to this
  • 3/14/2010 4:09 PM Tara wrote:
    Your last line,"Maybe I'll believe something different after I observe and think some more. But I don't think so." reminded me of a book by "Sir Charles" Barkley called, "I May Be Wrong But I doubt it." LOL. Consider this, if you don't think that you'll ever change your mind, then why think so much? Some of todays great thinkers, at least in my opinion, John Kerry and Jimmy Carter changed their minds after contemplation.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 6:50 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      I said the last line partly in jest - though it's honest for right now.  Great thinker or not, I've changed my certain mind quite a lot over the years - e.g., in 1988 I voted for George Bush.

      Reply to this
      1. 3/14/2010 9:25 PM Tara wrote:
        I have to ask why you voted for Bush, and I sincerely don't mean it as a criticism. I'm sincrely curious if you were maybe voting against Kerry. My husband says it's amazing how Bush was able to make a p***y out of a war hero when he didn't even fight. Was that it? Did he make the classic Democratic faux paux of being, well what my husband said?
        Reply to this
        1. 3/14/2010 10:00 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:
          I did vote for Kerry - but voted for the first Bush against Dukakis (in my defense, I was only 22).  Not sure exactly why now....  I also voted for Reagan when I was 18.

          Reply to this
          1. 3/15/2010 8:54 AM Tara wrote:
            Ok. My first time voting was for Dukakis and as I was voting for him, I was thinking that he really was not an exciting candidate, but I was excited to vote. I can understand you voting for Bush 1. I did have confidence in his competence for foreign relations although I did not agree with his decisions. I was surprised when I thought you voted for Bush II. I thought that Kerry and Gore both outperformed Bush II. As for Regan, I was in grade school, but already interested in politics b/c of my parents. I was happy with Mondale then, b/c my parents liked him, but now I like him for my own reasons. I can totally understand you voting for Regan, tell me if I'm wrong. My Dad explained Regan this way. I love the guy. Would love to have him over for dinner. Can't stand his Presidency, but understand his charisma.
            Reply to this
            1. 3/15/2010 1:27 PM Elena wrote:
              Since this blog was about thinking either too much or too little I just hope that everyone thinks a lot before they vote the next time. And I also hope that in the Congress they will do the same.
              Reply to this
      2. 3/14/2010 9:28 PM Tara wrote:
        After thinking it over I realised that I picked Carter and Kerry as two great thinkers, but even their need to consider and reconsider their options sometimes hampered their ability to convey their ideas. You certainly don't have that problem.
        Reply to this
    2. 3/14/2010 9:30 PM Tara wrote:
      I made that remark partly in jest, I hope you took it the way it was intended.
      Reply to this
      1. 3/14/2010 9:56 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:

        Reply to this
  • 3/14/2010 7:58 PM Anonymous wrote:
    Interesting thoughts and discussion above...


    I think in my mind there is a distinction between worry and concern.. worry is often unproductive.... "running on a hamster wheel" sort of thoughts that go nowhere... concern seems to me, to deal with a more productive search for solutions... thus politics and social problems, etc... are solved. I think that seemed to be your distinction John..

    As far as writing and creativity... I think we CAN over think... often a good idea can be killed from too much rewriting....( my father-in-law was a good example of it) or trying to imitate or trying to be too clever. Also I think if we have any ability at all then we have to learn to trust our instincts... sometimes we are too quick to take others opinions too much to heart as far as critiques and criticisms go... some times we just have to trust ourselves.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/14/2010 8:38 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      You remind me of this from Ferlinghetti's "Populist Manifesto #1" (from 1976):

      "No time now for the artist to hide
      above, beyond, behind the scenes,
      indifferent, paring his fingernails,
      refining himself out of existence...."

      And I agree - though I'd add that, conversely, if we let our nails grow too wildly they can become more obstacle than aid to our art.

      Reply to this
  • 3/16/2010 7:33 AM Marc Over Matter wrote:
    about positive disintegration -- yes, that is so right on. successfully navigating depression, anxiety, etc., moving through it brings one up above the clouds.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/16/2010 8:01 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      Thanks for your feedback, Marc!  There's nothing like safely navigating it....

      Reply to this
  • 3/16/2010 7:57 AM Stacey Mangiaracina wrote:
    I love this! I can't tell you how many times I've been told to stop overthinking things. Sometimes I can see when I'm doing it and other times I'm just realizing the alternate possibilities that seem endless. That is when I tell them that my creative genius is at work...stand back and let me think! Maybe it's part of that art lesson about sculptures that I was lucky enough to experience when I was younger. My teacher said the only way to truly appreciate a sculpture is by viewing it from all 5 sides. Well, when you apply that to life, the possibilities are endless! Thus, my thought process is thrown into overdrive. And, oh what a great ride it can be!
    Reply to this
    1. 3/16/2010 8:05 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
      Thanks for your comment, Stacey!  I especially like the analogy of looking at a sculpture from all five sides -- and I'm reminded of the Eastern story of the blind men "looking at" an elephant that I incorporated into my "Identity Crisis" poem.  I can't remember if I've sent you that chapbook yet.

      Reply to this
      1. 3/16/2010 8:53 AM Elena wrote:
        I'm thinking a lot right now. The words "identity crisis" were first used by Erik Erickson in his work on developmental psychology. Marc wrote a dissertation for the U. of Chicago on Erickson and is very interested also in Dabrowski's work on personality disintegration since it is much like Erik Erickson's work on childhood development. So one can never think too much I believe since it helps us understand ourselves and others and that reaps enormous benefits in our own lives. I checked both Dabrowski and Erickson on Wikipedia and learned a lot.
        Reply to this
        1. 3/16/2010 9:13 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
          Interesting - I either forgot or never knew that Erikson had coined that phrase.  I have some of his work in my home library - but it's been a long time (over 20 years) since I've read any.

          Here are some comments this post received on Facebook:

          Sun at 9:14am ·  ·  · Share
          Chansonette Buck
          Chansonette Buck 
          yup you be you
          Sun at 10:18am · 
          Shelley Chernin
          Shelley Chernin 
          This hits a nerve. All my life, people have been telling me that I think too much – as if I could control it.

          When people say that to me, they'r often trying to say that I’m too intense, and it makes them uncomfortable. I’m old enough now to let that be their problem.

          But sometimes, and more disturbingly, people have told me that I think too much because they’ve experienced me as too analytical and unemotional. For me, that’s been a more troublesome issue, and I’ve worked on it. In fact, it’s a big part of what brought me to poetry.

          You’ve nailed it when you say, “I am, therefore I think.” This is exactly the point Antonio Damasio, a neurologist, makes in the book "Descartes’ Error." As humans, both the species and individuals, we exist before we think, and the thinking results from the whole of our being.

          If something is out of balance or broken in some part of the system (for me, it was my emotional system), it affects thinking. Thinking less was not the answer for me. Feeling more was. As far as I'm concerned, the more thinking that goes on in this world, the better.
          Sun at 10:37am · 
          John Burroughs
          John Burroughs 
          Thank you - and excellent points.... I wanna respond at greater length, but it's time for me to be out the door. Will return this evening....
          Sun at 10:48am · 
          Sammy Greenspan
          Sammy Greenspan 
          Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration addresses this in context of what he dubbed "Overexcitabilities" (roughly translated). English translations and explanations of his work (Dab was a Polish MD PhD psychologist) are available here: http://positivedisintegration.com/

          In brief, under his theory, "thinking too much" would be a trait of one with Intellectual Overexcitability (which can also exist in other areas such as kinetic, emotional and imaginal). 

          This trait is the expression of exceptionally high intellectual capacity, and sometimes of high developmental potential, and as such is the opposite of "wrong." It reflects a powerful cognitive processor which may find little outlet in the neurotypical world where intellect per se is not highly valued, and in a culture where its full-throttle application is actually--amazingly, to me--denigrated. 

          There's plenty to say on this topic, but one point needs underscoring, John. Maybe your friends really meant you could benefit from more balance--a worthy consideration for some with high intellectual overexcitability. But if they simply meant you should willingly blunt your own mind, tell your friends to stuff it. Or, more to the point, spend your time with friends who celebrate the remarkable force and fluidity of your mind, and the potential it represents. 

          Just my (highly overexcitable) opinion, of course. I find anti-intellectualism repugnant anywhere, the more so in the arts.
          Sun at 11:31am · 
          Linda Stamberger
          Linda Stamberger 
          most people think too little...
          Sun at 12:40pm · 
          Tara Brennan Okin
          Tara Brennan Okin 
          Loved the blog. It's the one of the many reasons I read your work. It gets me thinking...
          Sun at 1:41pm · 
          Chansonette Buck
          Chansonette Buck 
          "celebrate the remarkable force and fluidity of your mind, and the potential it represents." yup. beautifully put. and true.
          Sun at 3:05pm · 
          Chansonette Buck
          Chansonette Buck 
          one of my closest friends has a sparkling and vivid intellect.....and is also a deeply feeling person...for her, though, "thinking too much" meant thinking about life situations (using her sparkling intellect) in ways that paralyzed her and sent her into bottomless chasms of depression, doubting her every decision, doubting her own path through ...See More
          Sun at 3:14pm · 
          Dirk Kortz
          Dirk Kortz 
          There are two distinct categories of "thinking" that we engage in daily but sometimes do not consciously distinguish. Thinking about a specific thing, idea, problem, etc. and the thinking that is merely the background radio of our minds broadcasting all sorts of random, sometimes troublesome bits and pieces. The first is obviously a good thing and should be encouraged, not disdained. The second can be useful when it is examined by the first and is often thereby a valuable source of creativity. Unexamined, it is just a distraction or worse.

          A small note in defense of Descartes: this famous and oft-maligned phrase was never intended to claim that one comes into being by thinking, but rather that in a world where it is possible to be deceived by my senses, the one thing I can know for sure is that in order to be deceived, I must exist. That's a bit of a paraphrase and an unjustly abbreviated comment on his philosophy but it's better than the way his words have been generally interpreted.
          Sun at 5:52pm · 
          John Burroughs
          John Burroughs 
          Thanks for your comments! I've come down with a bit of a cold and my head feels as though it might explode, so I will wait to respond to specifics until I feel I can again think "too much" effectively. Good night, my friends!
          Sun at 9:37pm · 
          Vlad Kunko
          Vlad Kunko 
          ... a rock doesn't so it isn't ...
          Sun at 11:45pm · 
          John Burroughs
          Yesterday at 9:29am · 
          Chansonette Buck
          Chansonette Buck 
          awwwwwww feel better soon. pound EmergenC!!!!
          Yesterday at 9:54am · 
          John Burroughs
          John Burroughs 
          @ Shelley - I want to read Descartes' Error. Spanish philosopher Miquel de Unamuno threw out "cogito ergo sum" and posited instead "siento luego soy" (I feel, therefore I am).
          42 minutes ago · 
          John Burroughs
          John Burroughs 
          I've wanted to add Unamuno's work to the Online Library - but I can't find out definitively whether it's still subject to copyright.

          @ Vlad - thanks for the laugh - and the "grounding" (bad pun intended). I imagine it's possible that all atoms, even those in rocks, might be "conscious" (or have the capacity for consciousness) on some level. Who knows?
          36 minutes ago · 
          John Burroughs
          John Burroughs 
          @ Sammy - I find Dąbrowski's theory fascinating and look forward to reading more. My thoughts don't feel lucid yet, thanks to this cold, but I've always kinda suspected something like this to be true - that the adage "no pain, no gain" could also be applied somewhat to mental "pain." Imperfect analogy, but... one reason I usually refuse to take pain medication (even when I had kidney stones) is I feel the pain is there for a reason - to ignore or dull it can lead to more harm than good, and successfully navigating it can lead to greater strength/wisdom/health. Similarly, I refuse to take anti-depressants - thinking there's a reason I'm depressed and I will be better off dealing with it than trying to mask it or make it quasi-magically "disappear."
          19 minutes ago · 
          John Burroughs
          John Burroughs 
          I could be full of crap, but it is so.
          about a minute ago · 


          Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.