Trackbacks

• Trackbacks are closed for this post.

Comments

• 5/17/2010 2:31 PM chris wrote:
  I'm glad you saw this John. Yes, I think it's the first time I agree with him as well.
  
  I understand their fears but I still don't think it is legal or right to do this. Because then why even impose a sentence? Just give a life term for all sexual offenses and be done with it. (that is sarcasm on my part)
  They don't do this with other crimes.
  
  Shades of Guantanimo.....
  Reply to this
  1. 5/17/2010 2:37 PM Jesus Crisis wrote:
     Thanks for sending me the link!
     Reply to this
     1. 5/17/2010 3:19 PM chris wrote:
        LOL... I'm so tired I forgot I sent it to you.. *sigh*
        Reply to this
• 5/17/2010 5:44 PM Tara wrote:
  I never thought I would say that I agree with Clarence Thomas either, but he called this one right.
  Reply to this
  1. 5/18/2010 5:32 AM Jesus Crisis wrote:
     I still can't believe it.  If you want to be able to keep someone locked up indefinitely, then give him a life sentence in the first place.
     Reply to this
     1. 5/18/2010 6:15 AM chris wrote:
        Wouldn't that be consider "cruel and unusual punishment"? To keep someone like that for an open ended amount of time beyond a sentence that was already specified. With no idea then if you will EVER be released?
        It would seem to me that it would be..
        
        Also doesn't that set a legal precident of some sort
        that would then enable them to keep other people they deem "dangerous" in a Guantanimo like fashion....
        
        It makes me shudder to think of the ramifications... it seems a break down of the justice system .
        Reply to this

Leave a comment